Social Media Communication in the News:
Real-Time Discussion Starters
Online Marketers Steal Social Media Influencer Faces
https://www.wired.com/story/youtube-instagram-influencers-stolen-faces/
Question: How could the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) make it easier to stop fake advertising?
Twitter Suspends 70 Pro-Bloomberg Accounts Over Manipulation
https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2020-02-21/twitter-suspends-bloomberg-accounts
Question: What do you think should be the spam limits for employee social media posts?
In Brief
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/14/bloomberg-meme-changes-facebook-instagram-115333
https://www.salon.com/2020/02/14/mike-bloomberg-is-paying-social-media-influencers-to-post-fake-messages-to-make-him-look-cool/
https://www.thedailybeast.com/mike-bloomberg-is-paying-influencers-to-make-him-seem-cool-9
https://apnews.com/86f306176a5e1043d2f825483e75f70d
Question: Why is it right or not for candidates to pay for influence posts?
SMC news is curated for Social Media Communication: Concepts, Practices, Data, Law and Ethics, third edition (2021).
Real-Time Discussion Starters
Online Marketers Steal Social Media Influencer Faces
Wired reports that YouTube and Instagram influencers say they have not authorized marketers to illegally paste their faces onto bodies to sell sketchy products. Once found, the first response should be to send a cease and desist email to Amazon or other sites failing to monitor advertising. An influencer must identify "the specific infringement" (para. 10). It may take the help of a lawyer or brand marketing expert to force a take-down of the image.
"For now, platforms are not proactively dealing
with image theft on behalf of influencers," the Wired investigation noted. "It’s up to the individual to
report it." Fans sometimes provide the first warning of trouble.
https://www.wired.com/story/youtube-instagram-influencers-stolen-faces/
Question: How could the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) make it easier to stop fake advertising?
Twitter Suspends 70 Pro-Bloomberg Accounts Over Manipulation
Twitter fought back against a political spam tactic of using dozens of accounts to blast identical messages, the Los Angeles Times reported. The suspension of 70 accounts included some permanent bans of hired content producers.
"These 'deputy field organizers' receive $2,500 per month to promote the
former New York mayor’s candidacy within their personal social circles,
in addition to other, more conventional duties," the newspaper reported. "They receive
campaign-approved language that they can opt to post."
https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2020-02-21/twitter-suspends-bloomberg-accounts
Question: What do you think should be the spam limits for employee social media posts?
In Brief
New Mexico Sues Google Over Collection of Children’s Data (AP, Feb. 20, 2020): https://apnews.com/68de82f96a1c61fdbd51dbb71bd8c1df
- Should Social Media Platforms Be Regulated? (Feb. 10, 2020, Forbes): https://www.forbes.com/sites/esade/2020/02/10/should-social-media-platforms-be-regulated/#55b2d7ef3370
Why the NYPD Subpoenaed a Reporter's Twitter Feed (The New York Times, Feb. 14, 2020): https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/14/nyregion/patriot-act-subpoena-nypd.html
Facebook
changed its Instagram paid political rules after presidential candidate
Mike Bloomberg hired "influencers" to post memes about the former New
York City mayor, Politico reports. "Under the new rules, the content will have to be clearly marked as sponsored" (para. 3)."The
spokesperson said in a statement that the rule change had been under
consideration for some time, with meme posts gaining traction as a
campaign tool, and with both political campaigns and government agencies
inquiring about the company's policies on their use," (para. 4).
Salon was blunt, calling these "fake" posts: "Former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg's campaign is paying social
media influencers and a social media firm to flood Instagram with fake
messages purportedly sent by the billionaire" (para. 1).
The Daily Beast earlier reported that influencers were being paid $150 per post: "For a fixed $150 fee, the Bloomberg campaign is pitching
micro-influencers—someone who has from 1,000 to 100,000 followers, in
industry parlance—to create original content 'that tells us why Mike
Bloomberg is the electable candidate who can rise above the fray, work
across the aisle so ALL Americans feel heard & respected'" (para. 4).
Update: The Associated Press called
the changes "murky" in raising concerns. "Facebook’s policies leave
plenty of loopholes, which campaigns
and candidates will likely find ways to exploit until Election Day, said
Dipayan Ghosh, a former Facebook employee who is currently co-director
of Harvard’s digital platforms and democracy project." Foreign
governments also may use the tactic. “We’re in for quite a lot of
turmoil and trouble,” Ghosh said (paras. 4-5).
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/14/bloomberg-meme-changes-facebook-instagram-115333
https://www.salon.com/2020/02/14/mike-bloomberg-is-paying-social-media-influencers-to-post-fake-messages-to-make-him-look-cool/
https://www.thedailybeast.com/mike-bloomberg-is-paying-influencers-to-make-him-seem-cool-9
https://apnews.com/86f306176a5e1043d2f825483e75f70d
Question: Why is it right or not for candidates to pay for influence posts?